Posts Tagged ‘1956’

1956 – GE Yes Man Teleoperator – (American)

Life Magazine 28 May 1956 p 125.

The disembodied device graciously helping the girl with her coat (above) is one of the most dexterous robots yet designed. Its arms have elbows that bend, wrists that swivel and three-clawed hands. Still being perfected by G.E., it is an electro-mechanical slave called the Yes Man which does the bidding of a human master who acts out the desired motions in pantomine. Attached in the master's hands are a pair of arms matching the robots. When the man moves his fingers, electric signals activate hydraulic pistons which move the Yes Man's claws the same way. Through a feedback system, the operator can feel what the robot is doing. Yes Man has a serious purpose. By watching it through TV, a technician sitting some distance away could safely guide the Yes Man through intricate tasks in an atomic laboratory.

The above article from "The Herald Journal" 24 May 1956.

I have very little information on this teleoperator.  From what I have found, only the Goertz manipulators were earlier with force-feedback.

1956 – “Robert the Robot” – Bernard Smith (Australian)

Above and below: "Robert" as he is today. These images are from the Scienceworks Science Museum's webpage (Photographed by Benjamin Healley). Reproduced courtesy of Museum Victoria.  This pdf gives some information as well.

Robbie the Robot can currently be viewed as part of the Scienceworks collection store tour – just ask your tour guide to point him out.  Tours run daily. Enquire at the Scienceworks information desk for details.

To limit wear and tear, Robbie, as the Museum calls him, now has the following maximum movement of parts – Right arm from just above the frame to a horizontal position.
The head revolves no further than to look over the left and right front corners of the main body.
The head tilts from looking straight ahead to looking down at approx. 20-25 degrees (to make eye contact with a child say 2 meters away.

from a comment made on the Scienceworks site re Robbie
 
19/10/2009 09:03 PM
Daniel
Bernard Smith was my uncle and when we used to visit his house he would often fire up Robbie and make his arm go up and down, much to our excitement. He also built a painting machine which randomly selected colours and painted lines. He called one of these paintings "Primeval Forest II" and entered it into the Herald Sun Art Show. It didn't win any prizes but apparently someone purchased it.He also made a noughts and crosses machine using valve technology and programmed it by getting my father to play endless games of noughts and crosses whilst he recorded the results.

Here's the transcription of the film clip.

Fire the maid! -(if any)
Robert the Robot
LOVES Housework
Cinesound Review

Men, if you want a household help who wont lag, gossip, or rifle your wallet, why not let Robert the Robo(t) walk over your threshold. He does everything but talk. While a woman, huh! Invented by Bernard Smith of Campberwell, Melbourne he's 6 ft tall and pours the tea with the grace of a duchess. His weight, if you must know, is a quarter of a ton, and dieting wont help.

Inside he has 13 electric motors and 200 yards of wiring and he'll do your bidding if you press the right button in the remote-control.  Bring the child in, show to Dadda, and then swing it to sleep. Certainly, Boss. Robert can go forward or backward, to the  right or left or just stand still. He can lift a couple of hundred pounds, but never throws rolling pins or back answers.

Carpet's a bit dirty? Leave it to Robert. He's the perfect household help alright.  Costs nothing for food, clothes or drink; always happy in his chores; leaves you in peace when you press the button. Yes, he's got everything, absolutely everything.
Robert, don't you dare wink you forward little robo(t) you.

The past's vision of the future is today's museum piece
Author: JOHN LAHEY
Date: 01/02/1994
Publication: The Age     Page: 2
 
Australians had a wonderful innocence in the 1950s. We believed in robots. The time was coming when robots would iron the clothes, rock the baby, clean the house and pour the tea. This belief was so strong that the robot pictured here actually starred in a newsreel called `Fire the Maid!'.
Robert the Robot (that's his name) has just gone to live at the Scienceworks museum in Spotswood. He is believed to be Australia's oldest surviving attempt at a robot. Certainly, he is the oldest in an Australian museum, says his curator, Geoff Holden.

Before Scienceworks acquired Robert he was kept in a shed. His parts are wonky. Mr Holden says Robert will be slowly restored and perhaps he will be farded. I had to tell Mr Holden that I begged his pardon and would he mind repeating what he had just said please.

“Farded," said Mr Holden. “Do you know what farding is?" I said yes, but I didn't think it applied to robots. Crikey, you can learn a lot in museums. Well, it turned out that farding means to embellish or gloss over something, and as a specific term it means to put make-up on an old face. It means Robert might get a coat of paint.

He is a remarkable robot, made from bits and pieces by a clever school teacher called Bernard Smith, who lived in Camberwell and died last year, aged 68. Mr Holden said: “This was backyard tinkering, but Bernard Smith solved a lot of little technical problems along the way."

One of the great problems for modern inventors, apparently, is that all the old disposal shops, stocked with surplus goods from the Second World War, have gone out of business, and so nobody gets the chance to tinker and make things. Mr Smith built Robert during the heyday of disposal shops, using aeroplane parts, lengths of metal shelving, lumps of wood, bits of radios and all sorts of things.

Robert looked good in his Cinesound newsreel, dating from the early 1950s. He ran off two car batteries, either six-volt or 12-volt. As Robert went through the housework, a commentator said he stood six feet (about 183 centimetres), worked on 13 electrical motors and 200 yards of wiring, and had the grace of a duchess. This was in the days before programming. Robert functioned only when someone pressed buttons on a remote-control board.

You should have seen him in the movie delicately pouring the tea  – a considerable feat, according to Mr Holden. “The hands of early robots just crashed the tea cups," he said. After Robert has been fixed and farded, Mr Holden thinks he might look good at the Scienceworks door, welcoming visitors and gesturing them inside.

Bernard Smith was an interesting inventor. He once devised a “painting machine", which drew random lines on paper, and he entered one of its productions in the Herald Outdoor Art Show under the title `Primeval Forest'. Someone bought it. 


Bernard Smith studying up on Robots

Dexterity being shown by pouring a cup of tea. Note the 3 potentiometers mounted on the outboard panel. These gave positional control of the right-arm, as distinct from the push-button start-stop controls. 

A close-up of the earlier remote control panel

Robbie tirelessly does the ironing…

and  collects the tea pot …

then pours a cuppa for his master….

With powerful motors, and a heavy body, Robert was capable of holding a small child whilst traversing across the floor without tipping over.


Built in the early 1950's by Bernard Smith a school teacher who lived in Camberwell, Victoria, Australia and at one time taught science at Hyde St. school in Footscray.
Robbie is built from military disposal parts of which there was a plentiful supply after WW2.
He originally ran off 2 x 12 volt car batteries but for convenience he isnow run from a 240/24v power supply.
The wheels are tail wheels from Mustang fighter aeroplanes.
The 24v motors (13 of them – see description below) would have served various duties in aeroplanes such as operating flaps, bomb bay doors etc.
Although the Motors are fairly small they exert tremendous force due to their gearing (several thousand to one).
As well as the above there are:
36 Relays
16 Capacitors
9 Potentiometers
16 Resistors
1 Transformer
32 Pushbuttons 7 Switches
Approx. 150 meters of multi-core cable

No.1 TURNS HEAD
No.2 NODS HEAD
No.3 OPENS/CLOSES LEFT HAND
No.4 EXTENDS LEFT ARM
No.5 RAISES/LOWERS LEFT ARM
No.6 OPENS/CLOSES RIGHT HAND
No.7 REVOLVES RIGHT HAND
No.8 OPERATES RIGHT LOWER ELBOW
No.9 OPERATES RIGHT UPPER ELBOW
No.10 RAISES/LOWERS RIGHT ARM
No.11 PROPULSION MOTOR
No.12 STEERING MOTOR (MISSING)
No.13 DYNAMOTOR INPUT 28V DC OUTPUT 250V DC

Right forearm, wrist, gripper, and original control panel. Reproduced courtesy of Museum Victoria.

Reproduced courtesy of Museum Victoria.

Detail of right-elbow showing the positioning potentiometer. Reproduced courtesy of Museum Victoria.

Detail of right-arm. Reproduced courtesy of Museum Victoria.


publication unknown – 1 May 1956

Robots by Robert the Robot
The author has constructed a robot named Robert, and intended as a step towards the useful household servant ideal. Robert, 6 ft. tall, is  broarder and thicker than any man. Made of steel, he weighs nearly a quarter of a ton. He is controlled remotely through 150 ft. of cable. Like the Robot, Garco, his right arm is controlled by a miniature arm. This can be moved by a flick of the little finger, but the robot's corresponding action is at least as powerful as that of any human arm. The left arm moves up and down and is push-button controlled. Left and right arms both have a gripping and releasing action and can spin  clockwise and anti-clockwise. Other buttons move Robert forward and backward, turn him right and left.
Many people in our community with minds perfectly sound have bodies which ideally limit their activities. We can imagine such a person able to move only a few fingers of one hand. He could easily and safely control a Mark 3 Robert. Robert could nurse him, move him from place to place, and even help him do carpentry and gardening.
Boxing is a sport under fire at the moment. Why not replace the boxers with robots, regulating h. p., weight, armour. etc. Fights could then be to the death.  As a "logIcal" development of Australian Rules [RH-2010 -Australia's football code], why not robot footballers? These could be repaired much more quickly than live ones. The stars of yesterday could control the robots from the sideline and the umpire, remotely checking the game a hundred miles away, would be compartitively safe.
Before you laugh off robots remember that many people laughed even more heartily at the first car. Obedient mechanical servants would be most useful, and while Robert has his faults, he is wide open to improvement.


It is interesting to recall that W. Grey Walter, in designing and constructing his robot tortoises, did so with the concept of "parsimony". That is, the adoption of the simplest and most frugel way to achieve the desired outcome. In Walter's case, for example, the valves [vacuum tubes] were connectd normally as amplifiers, then switched to be a multivibrator when triggered by the contact sensor. Without parsimony being applied, we might have seen an additional second set of valves wired for a single purpose,
What we see in Robert, which is more frugal than in "Garco" (see here), is based on the observation that as most people are right-handed, it is important for the right arm and hand to be the more dexterous given that the other arm, the left in most cases, is used far less and for much simpler tasks. [Note-  RH -The equation is a little different for left-handed people like myself who are more capable with their non-preferred arm/hand given that the world's artifacts are largely built by and for right-handed people!]

In Garco's case, the left claw is shaped differently than the right, and is designed more for holding things, whereas the right hand is smaller and pincer shaped offering more complex movement and finer control. Also like Garco, the remote control arm is for the right hand/arm, whereas the left is only push-button controlled.  Although the above text on Robert mentions a miniature arm on the control panel, although modifications have been made over time, I cannot see it in either of the still shots or in the video clip, although there is an out-board panel in the video that has three potentiometers and as seen in the video clip that does control the positioning of the arm and hand.  The potentiometers in both the control panel and the arm work together to form a Wheatstone bridge.  When the control panel potentiometer moves, the robot's arm servo's in to equalise the bridge, thus reflecting the same positional change. The use of remote control arms is now current practice in the form of "Waldo's" as used in animatronics and animation, although they are digitally controlled. As I mentioned on the Garco page, the control arm of the master-slave unit pre-dates the harness used by the Disney Imagineers for their Audio-Animatronics by 10 years. Robbie is the second Humanoid robot that I'm aware of that employed this remote-controlled servo feedback positioning technology.

Robert's left arm is capable of being raised up or down, extends the length of the forearm, and open or close his left hand. He has no elbow, and cannot rotate his wrist.
His right arm, although it cannot extend, has a bendable elbow and a rotatable wrist.

Some other aspects in the above article worth mentioning is Smith's prediction in what we now call "Robot Wars", i.e. robots that 'fight to the death', and more interesting, as well as the use for hazardous materials, the use as a household servant to assist those with less-abled bodies, doing chores such as carpentry and gardening. Very few before Bernard Smith have reflected on this aspect, prefering to focus on a future society where robots are labour saving devices to give us humans more leisure time.
What was lacking in Smith's time were small, programmable control devices. We really had to wait another 30 years or so on the microprocessor with sufficient processing speed and memory to control the hardware.


The above photos were taken by Bernard's late brother, Paul Smith. Thanks to Paul's son Daniel for supplying the images.


1956-57 – Elektronikus Katicabogár (Electronic Ladybird) – Dr. Muszka Dániel (Hungarian)

Daniel Muszka, June 2009, giving a demonstration . Initially he shows basic photo-tropism, where the ladybug turns left, right, or travels straight ahead, depending upon which of three photo-electric cells is illuminated. He then goes on to demonstrate the conditioned reflex capability. He explains that due to age and the time it takes to learn, the ladybird's pen is too small, so he mounts it on a block to the drive wheels are free to rotate. He then uses a whistle  along with the light source (a torch) to train it. Eventually, just by blowing the whistle, and no light source, it has now been conditioned to drive the motors (you can hear the motors whirring into action).  The 'memory' is a slow drain in the capacitor, so it soon forgets the conditioned response (the whistle) and has to be re-taught. Daniel then demonstrates the contact sensors i.e. the black dots, and shows how these stop the ladybird. A re-assuring stroke of the ladybird's back (actually the depressing of a vane on the model's back) restores function. Daniel then removes the fibreglass shell and shows its internal workings. 

 

Dr Muszka Dániel (1930-) . Daniel with his Elektronikus Katicabogár (Electronic Ladybird) 

 A young Daniel (on the right)l with László Kalmár (1905-1971, IEEE Computer Pioneer 1997). University of Szeged

 

The above picture shows the first version of  Szegedi Katicabogár. The wheel on the left is powered for steering and appears to utilize the fixed angle method rather than a continuous rotary motion similar to Grey Walter's tortoises.

 

The images in yellow above are from an early paper. The pdf is here Szeged Katicabogar Muszka Daniel. When I complete the English translation I will publish it here in this blog post.

 

Cybernetic Machines – T Nemes, translated by W A Ainsworth, Budapest

1969, p172
The "Coccinella", constructed at the Institute of Pedagogy and Psychology of Szeged University, Hungary, is a 'machina docilis' of the appearance of a ladybird, of 60 cm length and 25 cm height. Two of its photoelectric cells are connected like those of the Philips dog, so that if the machine has once "caught glimpse" of a lamp, it interrupts its search and heads towards the lamp till a third photoelectric cell switches the drive motor off when the light source is in the axis of the machine. On tapping or pressing the spots of the ladybird, the machine stops and emits a soft murmuring sound. This sound ceases when the back of the machine is stroked, and the machine begins to move again. The sound of a whistle of a certain pitch makes some lamps mounted on the machine light up. Several such conditioned reflexes can be stored, because the circuit which reproduces the development of the conditioned reflex is exceedingly simple (one tube only!). There are only 7 vacuum tubes, 3 crystal diodes, 3 photoelectric cells, 1 microphone and 2 motors in the machine: Instead of a battery of its own (the early models carried small batteries) this machine trails a flex connected to the mains.

Note: Nemes above says the Ladybird searches for light, where in actual fact the ladybird only moves if it sees a light.

 The Szegedi Katicabogár as it was in 2009. The power supply has been upgraded. This is the second version which had major changes, particularly around the steering. What was previously the steering wheel is now just a castor wheel. The side wheels are independent and operate off their own motors (early windscreen wiper motors).

Detailed photograph showing the castor wheel. What looks like a simple relay in the foreground is actually a buzzer. This buzzer sounds when Katicabogár is stopped when one of the black dots is pressed.  The photo below shows the inside of the shell, and one can see what looks like a red 'fin'. This is spring loaded and wired and protrudes from the top of the shell.  When the shell is "petted" (actually pushing the long "fin" down, the ladybird starts up again, re-assured that it is now safe to continue. If there was any conditioned reflex action learned, it is now forgotten. 

The cylinder to the left of the black contact dot is a modern replacement for the original microphone. Further to the left of the photo one can see two of the three photo-electric cells used . (They are coloured red as original)

No trickery here. The original valves (vacuum tubes) have their heaters glowing, ready for action. Original relays still work, but occasionally a contact wont conduct.

Daniel Muszka training  Katicabogár for conditioned reflex action. He shone the torch into the central photo-electric cell and blew the flute at the same time. This was repeated multiple times until eventually the Katicabogár move forward just by blowing the flute.  Regular blowing of the flute would continue to re-inforce the conditioned reflex. If the flute was not played again, the model would eventually forget the reflex and would either have to be taught again, or just follow a light source only.

  

The above pic is a clip from a TV news clip whereby the local TV station had invited Daniel in to demonstrate the Katicabogár. Everything was ready to go until they switched the studio lights on which totally confused the machine. They quickly relocated the demonstration to the nearby floor, but Daniel was only formally dressed from the waist up, wearing sandals, etc. Clever lighting ensured a successful demo without highlighting Daniel's casual garb from the waist down.

 

The first version of the shell was made out of papier mache. Over time becoming brittle and showing signs of cracking. A modern reproduction of Katicabogár was produced for the Budapest Museum. A second mould of the shell was taken and now adorns the original Katicabogár in Szeged. 

 

 

Rough machine translation of the description found here http://www.inf.u-szeged.hu/~csendes/katica/honlap/mukodes.htm

The Ladybird models both the unconditional and conditional reflex models. It is able to respond to a sound, to light, and to touch. If the light and sound stimuli are at the same time it learns that it should respond to a sound in the same manner as earlier it did to the light, that is, a conditional reflex takes shape in him. This learned reflex may be forgotten if the stimuli are not presented again.
After the Ladybird is switched on the eyes of the beetle do not respond to dim light. If a light-source (ie. torch) is shone into his eyes the animal moves in the direction of the light and if the torch is moved the Ladybird will follow it. If the light is turned off or is too far away, it stops then, his eyes is insensitive again to dim light. If a flute is played, the eyes flash, indicating that he perceives the sound. If the light and the sound stimuli are coincident then they are associated then the beetle moves when it hears the sound only, and moves in a straight line.
Under the dots of the beetle are switches. If we press one, or if he touches an object then the result is he closes his eyes (the same as if the light was turned off), expresses his disapproval with a growl, forgets the learned reflex and in this state neither reacts to light nor to sound. We can comfort it in that situation by caressing button on his back. At this time the growl stops, his eyes light up, and he becomes reactive again.

The above replica was made in 2004 for the Budapest museum , I believe. It uses modern electronics, modern windscreen wiper motors. The shell made for this version was duplicated and the copy is now the shell for the original one in Szeged.

June 2009 – Reuben Hoggett (the author), Daniel Muszka, and David Buckley pose with the Szegedi Katicabogár. Photo taken by Mike Bohus.

Trip Notes June 2009

"We need to keep in mind the politics of both Hungary and Austria at this time.  Post WW2 , Hungary fell under the influence of the Soviet Union officially by 1949, with the Soviets crushing the Hungarian revolution later in 1956. Stalinism was experienced during the end of fourties and the beginning of fifties in Hungary, the political police arrested not only the ruling members of the former regime, but also the most distinguished members of the intelligencia. They then constructed legal cases against them. The fortunate ones were sentenced to prison for a short or long time. Unfortunately, some excellent specialists were sentenced to death. In 1955, the Austrian State Treaty and ensuing declaration of neutrality established Austria as a demilitarized and neutral country.

Daniel Muszka built his first lady-bug starting 1956 and finished in 1957.
Its interesting to note that the Zemanek models (Vienna, Austria) were not "scanners" i.e. photo-electric cells mounted on a rotating front steering wheel, but utilized a fixed angle reverse turn mechanism. 
The first Hungarian model by Angyan was a full rotary scanner. Daniel  was requested by the newly formed  Cybernetics Laboratory headed by Laszlo Kalmar to build a conditioned reflex model. He requested information from Angyan but is was not forthcoming. His brief was to build a model that encompassed Tropism, conditioned reflex, and defensive reflex.  Although the first model had a partially rotating front steering wheel (spring return as per Vienna model), the photo-electric cells (PEC) were not mounted with it, but he deployed three fixed PEC's mounted in the shell.  Daniel did say he had difficulty getting this first version working properly, and subsequently moved to steering powered by the rear drive wheels. The left and right PEC's were used for steering, and the front PEC used  for the driving forward.  Daniel had an excellent understanding of electronics, and was building radio sets early in life. He used this knowledge to build the lady-bug. I believe the second version was built to his own design from a descriptions mentioned above, for he had nothing else!
Grey Walter himself commented in his book "The Living Brain"  that there were difficulties in getting the mechanics of his models to work properly.
 

Bohus Mihály (1949-) . Above is a picture of Mike (as Englsh-speaking people would call him) going through a demonstration of phototropics. The daily running of the Museum (www.infmuz.hu) is largely down to Mike these days, whose speciality is Telecommunications.

The Computer Museum is well worth the visit. My own IT career started in the early 1970's and I had fun playing with the old IBM 360 / 370 series mainframe computers and peripherals. Quite a flashback for me.  A visit is by arrangement only so please contact Mike in the first instance.

 Informatika Történeti Múzeum Alapítvány Gy?jteménye
 (Collection of Foundation of Informatic History Museum),
Address: H-6728 Szeged, Budapesti út 5.
 (Building of earlier soviet military camp,
  NW of Szeged, near SZEGED sign on E75/5 road to Budapest)

1956 – CYSP-1 – Nicolas Schöffer – (Hungarian/French)

Although built as an art piece, Nicolas Schöffer's CYSP-1 (a name composed of the first letters of CYbernetics and SPatiodynamic) is significant both in terms of the introduction of a new art form, as well as being a serious attempt  as an autonomous "being".  Schöffer was the first artist to be inspired by the new science of Cybernetics, and went so far as to describe a whole cybernetic city based on his so-called "Spatio-Dynamics".

Before showing some early articles about CYSP-1, I want to briefly describe the functions it performs. To put it into context, given the usage of "electronic brains" that prevail in the articles, I thought I would give the components of  "electronic brains" as they were thought of at the time (i. e. mid 1950's).

Essentially they are:  SENSORY ORGAN -> NERVE SYSTEM -> BRAIN -> MUSCLES

One expects Schöffer’s CYSP-1 to conform to this early definition of "electronic brain".

Philips were sponsors for CYSP-1 and the earlier "Spatio-dynamic tower".  One of the articles in the book "Nicolas Schöffer" describes the "homeostatic" electronic brain used in tha tower sculpture.  Based on the descriptions on CYSP-1's behaviour, it, too, appears to be modelled on the homeostat. The homeostat, as first described and modelled by Ashby, essentially seeks an equilibrium point when it gets out of balance.  CYSP-1 is a homeostat on wheels.

For completeness, I'll make the "Spatio-dynamic tower" homeostat comparison with CYSP-1 here:

From an article in the book "Nicolas Schöffer":

" a homeostat constantly seeks to establish a balance which is perpetually disrupted, and performs a statistical exploration of all the possible combinations of inputs.
The actual research on the apparatus is guided by a triple determinism which integrates:
1. one element of uncertainty created by an "indifferent cell," which systematically makes use of chance;
2. one element of "sensorial reactions" which integrates the effects of the sound atmosphere, of the light atmosphere and of the heat atmosphere;
3. an "internal determinism" created by the feedbacks of the various active chains among one another, in order to liberate the machine progressively. Its degree of liberty can easily be modified.
The objective sought is above all of an experimental order. As for electronic animals, the synthesis of the faculties must be effected very gradually, and the behavior of the "models" man makes of himself must be observed. This exploration by the "models" of physiology, psychology and sociology marks the opening of a new path in research."
 

In point 2, CYSP-1 is affected by sound intensity, by light intensity and heat (an interpretation of the colour of the light eg red=warm, blue=cold).  Sound is detected by microphone input, and CYSP-1 reacts by being excited by silence and is calmed by noise. Photoelectric cells detecting colour are excited by the color blue, which means that it moves forward, retreats or makes a quick turn, and makes its plates turn fast; it becomes calm with red. It is also excited in the dark and becomes calm in intense light. CYSP-1 has total autonomy of movement (being travel in all directions at two speeds) as well as axial and eccentric rotation, and the setting setting in motion of its 16 pivoting polychromed plates (11 rectangular, 5 disc). This is the internal feedback talked about in point 3 above, and is the BRAIN, in this case a homeostatic one. "Liberating the machine" can be seen as a general reference to the  MUSCLES in the "electronic brain" model above.

When used for dancing or outdoor movements, there was a radio remote control to ensure safety to nearby people and CYSP-1 itself.  Later on, CYSP-1 is fitted with some photo-electric cell sensors underneath the base that detect dark and light. This way, if a dark line is drawn to create a closed space, CYSP-1 will not cross that line and keep its movements within that space. This is evident in the Paris Atelier today where CYSP-1 normally lives. (see pic below). 

A point of interest I learned when talking with Eleanor (2009) is that Nicolas put in place a directive that in order to keep the sculptures operational over time, that the use of current technology be deployed, rather than conserving or restoring older technology that will prove difficult to service or get spare parts.

CYSP-1 is about 8 foot tall.


From “Practical Robot Circuits” A.H. Bruinsma – a Philips Technical publication

This extract is to provide the reader with a contextual and period definition of “electronic brain”.  Large computers were very new and mini-computers were yet to be invented.  These “electronic brains” are very different to modern digital computers.

"Robot circuits comprise certain elements which, although more highly developed or specialized in some circuits than in others, are nevertheless common to all of them, as follows (see fig. 1).
SENSORY ORGAN -> NERVE SYSTEM -> BRAIN -> MUSCLES
Fig. 1. Basic elements of a robot circuit.
1. sensory organ, that is, a portion of the circuit capable of picking up (or observing) different stimuli and converting them into electric current or voltage; accordingly, there are many different types of sensory organ;
2. nerve-system, that is, the portion of the circuit which modifies the current or voltage so that it may be applied to and used in:
3. the brain, or portion of the circuit sorting and processing the data from the nerve system, and possibly storing them (memory) before transmitting them to:
4. the muscles, or portion of the system producing the desired reaction to the stimuli picked up by the sensory organs.
With human beings and animals it is often difficult to discern where the nervous system ends and the brain begins; so also with many robot circuits.
It will be evident that the above names are chosen to emphasize the similarity between the synthetic elements referred to and living organs of the human body. Although there is nothing against this in theory, it will be seen later that in reality electronic organs often function very differently from the human or animal equivalents. At the same time it will also be seen that the temptation to draw a parallel between them, occasionally, has proved irresistible.
As we shall see, then, electronic sensory organs range from the rudimentary to the highly sensitive. They are sometimes inferior, sometimes equal, and in many cases superior, to human sensory organs.
Electronic nerve systems, although comparable in speed and accuracy to the human nerves as conveyors of information, cannot in any one machine equal them for complexity.
In the matter of brains, electronics is definitely outclassed. Electronic brains, without the gift of creative reasoning, are comparable only with the portion of the human brain governing reflexes, or actions performed instinctively, without thought.
Electronic memories, on the other hand, are best as regards reliability, being capable of storing up to ten thousands different items of information indefinitely; however, their capacity is very limited compared with the enormous variety of information assimilated by the human
brain.
Because this may suggest that on the whole electronic robots are barely on par with the lowest known species of animal, it should also be borne in mind that for practical applications they are so specialized for strictly limited tasks as to be, within the particular province, far superior to human operators; hence their importance to mankind.
It is typical of the world in which we live that everyone must specialize in order to be reasonably efficient, and electronic robots carry specialization far beyond what any man can hope to achieve."
  


CYSP 1, the first cybernetic sculpture
CYSP 1 (a name composed of the first letters of cybernetics and spatiodynamic) is the first " spatiodynamic sculpture " having total autonomy of movement (travel in all directions at two speeds) as well as axial and eccentric rotation (setting in motion of its 16 pivoting polychromed plates).
Nicolas Schöffer has executed this spatial composition in steel and duraluminum, into which an electronic brain, developed by the Philips Company, has been incorporated.
The whole is set on a base mounted on four rollers, which contains the mechanism and the electronic brain. The plates are operated by small motors located under their axis. Photoelectric cells and a microphone built into the whole catch all the variations in the fields of color, light intensity and sound intensity.
All these changes occasion reactions on the part of the sculpture consisting of combined travel and animation. For example: it is excited by the color blue, which means that it moves forward, retreats or makes a quick turn, and makes its plates turn fast; it becomes calm with red, but at the same time it is excited by silence and calmed by noise. It is also excited in the dark and becomes calm in intense light.
Inasmuch as these phenomena are constantly variable, the reactions are likewise ever changing and unpredictable, which endows the mechanism with an almost organic life and sensitivity.
Cybernetics
CYSP 1 launches upon an adventure unique in the history of art. It participates in artistic life on multiple levels.
In an actual spectacle, it dances in ballets with one or several human partners. It takes its place in motion pictures. An abstract film, for instance, is being planned, using all possible visual effects, such as the stroboscopic effect which occurs when its polychrome plates turn at the speed of light vibrations, giving an effect of immaterial colored blends; its shadow projected in movements gives the spectacle a double effect. Its transparency confers upon it multiple partially arrested aspects. It can adapt itself to the theater and participate in exhibitions.
It constitutes a living counterpoint, a new and harmonious contrast with the articulated movements of the undulating bodies of humans by its evolutions and its transparent, orthogonal and metallic structure.
This artificial being is the prototype of a whole series of other spatiodynamic sculptures which could stage a great cybernetic spectacle on the ground and even in the air, thus creating a true synthesis between the most advanced aesthetic conceptions and the most up-to-date scientific means, capable of multiplying their attractive possibilities tenfold.
The making of an animated spatiodynamic sculpture marks the first attempt at allying abstract sculpture and choreography. Both of these, reflecting as they do a comparable artistic expression, have been fused into a single object thanks to electronics and to cybernetics.
Maurice Bejart showed this robot-dancer for the first time in 1956 in a ballet performance. He executed with it a pas de deux to the accompaniment of a concrete music composition by Pierre Henry.
Spatiodynamic sculpture, for the first time, makes it possible to replace man with a work of abstract art, acting on its own initiative, which introduces into the show world a new being whose behavior and career are capable of ample developments.
Cysp 1, 1956, the first cybernetic sculpture with autonomous movements on the stage of the Sarah-Bernhardt Theater


and from the book “Nicolas Schöffer” – Essay “From Space to Time” by Guy Habasque.

This excursion into the realm of electronics made Schöffer even bolder and gave him the idea of resorting to cybernetics to animate his sculptures. The dynamism he had achieved, interesting though it was, had thus far remained what I have elsewhere called a " static dynamism " (dynamis, in fact, means power and not movement). It is true that he had already tried, in 1950, in a " spatiodynamic clock ", to introduce real movement by supplying the sculpture with little electric motors, but cybernetics opened up to him a much vaster field of action, and even made available to him combinations of movements in practically unlimited numbers. Above all it introduced a real element of indetermination in the kinetic behavior of the work. After a good deal of difficult research, and very delicate developing and perfecting (carried out in collaboration with Francois Terny, an engineer of the Philips Company), Schöffer, on May 28, 1956, on the occasion of the " Night of Poetry " in the Sarah Bernhardt Theater in Paris, presented his first "cybernetic sculpture ", CYSP I, the name of which is formed by the first two letters of the words " cybernetics " and " spatiodynamics " respectively. This mechanism, capable of articulated movements and locomotion without the direct help of a human agent, seemed endowed with an almost organic sensitivity. I say " seemed ", for it is quite obvious that no sculpture can be compared to a living being. Nevertheless, as anyone knows who has studied cybernetics a little, once the machine has been fed " information ", it acquires real autonomy of action. Provided with an electronic brain (concealed in its base), acting on a system of motor organs, CYSP I moves at two different speeds while putting into motion its sixteen pivoting polychrome plates. By virtue of a system of photoelectric cells and microphones, it is sensitive to all variations occurring in the realms of color, light intensity and sound intensity. A blue light, for example, emitted by a projector, produces a rapid movement, whereas a red light calms it and causes its movements to slow down. Likewise, it is excited by silence or darkness and calmed by noise or a bright light.

Despite the outcries of old-fashioned aestheticians who are always afraid of not finding the creator revealed in his work, the application of cybernetics opens immense horizons to the plastic arts. The possibility of animating space in an entirely new way is indeed coupled with the introduction of a temporal element which had never been taken into account in the conception of a work of art. Space and time are henceforth indissolubly linked. Moreover, the work of art is no longer an inanimate object, which can be taken in at a glance, but constitutes of itself a whole spectacle. This aspect has led Schöffer to stress what might be called the " theatrical " possibilities of these sculptures and to have CYSP I participate in certain shows, in particular in choreographic shows. Thus Maurice Bejart, who was then the director of the " Ballets de l'Etoile ", composed specially for it a ballet which was first shown in August 1956 at the first Festival of Avant-Garde Art in Marseille, on the roof of Le Corbusier's famous housing unit. He used the sculpture in conjunction with human partners, the flexibility and grace of the dancers creating a very striking and effective contrast with the rigid and orthogonal lines of the spatiodynamic skeleton, Pursuing his research, as always, to its ultimate consequences, Schöffer a little later conceived and executed the model of a theater specially designed for "cybernetic spectacles ", and for a long time he has even been entertaining plans for aerial spatiodynamic ballets. The theater is roofed over with a flattened semispherical dome beneath which the tiers of seats for the spectators rotate round an axis, while the ring- shaped stage also rotates, but in the opposite direction, round the center. In contrast to the customary arrangement the spectacle (cybernetic and human ballets, luminodynamic projections, etc.) consequently unfolds on the walls, and the audience also moves to follow the various elements that compose it. In the aerial ballets, space itself will serve as the stage, with the sculptures in movement evolving in the air, like helicopters.


Note on the homeostat produced by the Philips Company for the International Building and Public Works Exhibition, Paris 1955
An electronic brain is being built which will associate notes so as to compose constantly varying musical motifs. This will be effected by means of a homeostat which constantly seeks to establish a balance which is perpetually disrupted, and performs a statistical exploration of all the possible combinations of notes.
The actual research on the apparatus is guided by a triple determinism which integrates:
1. one element of uncertainty created by an " indifferent cell, " which systematically makes use of chance;
2. one element of " sensorial reactions " which integrates the effects of the sound atmosphere, of the light atmosphere and of the heat atmosphere;
3. an "internal determinism" created by the feedbacks of the various active chains among one another, in order to liberate the machine progressively. Its degree of liberty can easily be modified.
The objective sought is above all of an experimental order. As for electronic animals, the synthesis of the faculties must be effected very gradually, and the behavior of the " models " man makes of himself must be observed. This exploration by the " models " of physiology, psychology and sociology marks the opening of a new path in research.
Secondarily, the machine will produce anharmonic musical motifs, many of which will be of no great interest and will constitute a background of sound, while others will appeal to the ear. The sound material, pre-recorded by Pierre Henry, the composer of concrete music, author of the Voile d'Orphée (The Veil of Orpheus), will always be interesting and rich.
The sounds heard do not exist in nature any more than the associations of sounds invented by the machine are referable to our consciousness of harmony.
J. BUREAU Consulting engineer


from the French science magazine Science et Vie, September 1956

 
“CYSP 1”
danseuse-étoile est un robot
Un étrange spectacle nocturne s'est déroulé le 8 août à Marseille sur l'immense terrasse qui coiffe l'immeuble Le Corbusier.  Pendant que des danseuses évoluaient gracieusement devant une sculpture abstraite faite de cornières d'acier et de feuilles de cuivre, un projecteur rouge s’alluma soudain. Les sons bizarres d'une musique concrète retentirent et, telle la statue du Commandeur, la sculpture s'anima brusquement. Elle entra dans la danse,
avantant et reculant sur des cadences inattendues, faisant vibrer ses pales métalliques, mêlant ses glissades compliquées aux mouvements souples des corps humains.
« CYSP 1 », premier robot danseur, venait de faire ses premiers pas. OEuvre du sculpteur Nicolas Schöffer et des ingénieurs de la société Philips, cette machine, unique en son genre, inaugure une nouvelle étape de l'histoire de l'art et des techniques. Grâce à des mécanismes électroniques télécommandés ou programmés selon un thème précis, ou encore déclenchés par des variations de température, de sons ou de lumières colorées, elle peut se déplacer et vibrer en tous sens. Elle sera prochainement la vedette d'un-film et fera son entrée théâtrale cet automne à Paris. Nicolas Schöffer a réalisé, en 1955, la « Tour Chantante » de la première exposition internationale de Bâtiment à Saint-Cloud. Il est le chef d'une nouvelle école artistique dite « spatio-dynamique ».
Certaines de ses oeuvres sont déjà exposées dans des musées ,aux Etats-Unis.
CAPTION :
SUR LA SCENE DU THEATRE SARAH-BERNHARDT, A PARIS, DES DANSEUSES REGLENT LES PREMIERS
PAS DU ROBOT CYBERNETIQUE, ŒUVRE DU SCULPTEUR ABSTRAIT NICOLAS Schöffer.

CAPTION:
Au pied du robot, la danseuse Claude Bessy et deux ingénieurs de la Société Philips (à droite). L'ensemble de « CYSP 1 » est fixé sur un socle monté avec 4 roulettes mues par des moteurs électriques commandés par un cerveau électronique. Des cellules photoélectriques et des microphones captent des messages programmés sur un pas de danse : chaque plaque colorée des bras de la machine se met alors à vibrer et à tournoyer sur des rythmes différents combinés avec les déplacements du robot et ceux des danseurs.

Cet être artificiel, campé sur les roulettes de caoutchouc de son cerveau électronique, est, selon les projets de Nicolas Schöffer, le prototype de toute une série de sculptures animées « spatio-dynamiques » qui seront les vedettes de grands spectacles cybernétiques. Des fusées, des avions, des hélicoptères, de la brume artificielle colorée, des projections lumineuses dans l'espace compléteront les entrechats mécaniques de ce peuple de robots dont les ombres en mouvement doubleront le spectacle.
Nicolas Schöffer prévoit aussi l'adjonction d'un homéostat à ses sculptures-robots : mouvements d'ensemble, variations isolées seraient déclenchées par la modification du milieu ambiant : température, hygrométrie, lumière du jour, sons et couleurs.
Grâce à cette animation, proche de certaines formes de vie organique, les sculptures spatio-dynamiques ne resteraient pas cantonnées sur la scène des théâtres ; exposées au regard des passants dans les grandes artères des grandes villes, elles constitueraient un spectacle permanent « son-lumière et animation » et permettraient aux citadins d'échapper parfois au sentiment de claustration provoqué par la laideur de certains quartiers d'habitation.
Ces sculptures, dignes de la science-fiction, rempliraient un rôle analogue, non seulement dans les pièces importantes des habitations, mais aussi dans les halls et dans les salles des grands bâtiments publics, les usines, les gares, les aérodromes, etc.
Sous cet aspect et, si l'on en croit les médecins et sociologues penchés sur ce problème bizarre, les robots abstraits de Schöffer seraient à l'origine d'une nouvelle science : la plastico-sociologie.
Cette science étudierait les effets des formes architecturales mécaniques sur le comportement de l'homme. Elle tenterait d'améliorer la qualité esthétique de cet immense cinérama qu'est devenue la vie moderne tout au fond de notre rétine. Selon ses théoriciens, l'homme normalement constitué a besoin d'une ration quotidienne de chocs esthétiques optiques ou auditifs d'une qualité supérieure. Or, cela se vérifie surtout dans nos cités vétustes, il y a généralement insatisfaction aggravée par la mauvaise qualité des « chocs ». Ce véritable « attentat rétinien » provoque à la longue des troubles psychiques : par exemple un complexe d'infériorité, puisque nous devons subir « ce qui est ». Le rôle des sculpteurs spatio-dynamiques sera de transformer cette ambiance désastreuse grâce à des proportions harmonieuses et à des couleurs thérapeutiques dosées qui réaliseront un équilibre énergétique entre la nature et le milieu artificiel où vit l'homme moderne.
Gérard COTTIN
Photos Frasnay et E. B. Weil.

Translation:
"CYSP 1"
star-dancer is a robot
A strange night show was held August 8 in Marseille on the huge terrace, which covers the building Le Corbusier. While dancers moving gracefully to an abstract sculpture made of angle steel and copper sheets, projector suddenly turns red. The sounds of a strange sound and musique concrete, like the statue of the Commendatore, the sculpture comes alive suddenly. She entered the dance,
front and back of unexpected cadences, its vibrating metal blades, combining its complicated movements glissades soft human bodies.
"CYSP 1", the first robot dancer, came to take its first steps. Work by the sculptor Nicolas Schöffer and engineers of Philips, this machine is unique in its kind, heralds a new stage in the history of art and technology. Through electronic mechanisms remotely or programmed in a specific theme, or triggered by changes in temperature, sound or light colored, it can move and vibrate in all directions. She will soon star in a film and theater will be introduced this fall in Paris. Nicolas Schöffer produced in 1955, the "Singing Tower" of the first International Exhibition Building in St. Cloud. He is the head of a new artistic school known as "spatio-dynamic".
Some of his works are exhibited in museums in the United States.

CAPTION:
ON THE SCENE OF THE THEATER-SARAH BERNHARDT, PARIS, dancers GOVERN THE FIRST
NOT THE ROBOT CYBERNETICS, WORK OF NICOLAS Schöffer ABSTRACT SCULPTOR.

CAPTION:
Robot at the foot of the dancer Claude Bessy and two engineers from the company Philips (right). The whole "CYSP 1" is set on a pedestal mounted with 4 wheels driven by electric motors controlled by an electronic brain. Photoelectric cells and microphones capture messages programmed on a dance step: each colored plate of the arms of the machine starts to vibrate and spin in different speeds combined with the movements of the robot and the dancers.

This being artificial, camped on the rubber wheels of his mind, is, according to draft Schöffer Nicolas, the prototype of a series of animated sculptures "spatio-dynamic" to be the stars of big shows cyber. Rockets, planes, helicopters, fog artificial colored light projections in space complement entrechats mechanical robots that people whose shadows moving double the performance.
Nicolas Schöffer also adding a homeostatis his sculptures robots: motion picture, isolated changes be triggered by the change in ambient temperature, humidity, light, sounds and colors.
With this animation, close to some forms of organic life, sculptures spatiotemporal dynamics would not remain confined to the theater scene, set against the great passers in the streets of major cities, they constitute a permanent show "its light – and animation and allow the city to escape the feeling sometimes of confinement caused by the ugliness of some residential areas.
These sculptures worthy of science fiction, fulfill a similar role, not only in major parts of houses, but also in the halls and rooms in large public buildings, factories, railway stations, airports, etc..
In this aspect, and if you believe the doctors and sociologists discussed this strange problem, robots abstract Schöffer are the cause of a new science: the plastico-sociology.

This science of studying architectural effects on mechanical behavior of man. It attempted to improve the aesthetic quality of this huge cinerama what became modern life at the back of our retina. According to its theorists, humans normally need a daily ration of optical or aesthetic shock of hearing the highest quality. However, this was particularly true in our older cities, there is dissatisfaction generally aggravated by the poor quality of "shocks". This true "retinal attack" in the long term causes of psychiatric disorders: for example an inferiority complex because we must endure "what is". The role of spatio-dynamic sculptors will transform the atmosphere with disastrous proportions and harmonious colors therapeutic dose realize energy balance between nature and the natural environment inhabited by modern man.
Gérard COTTIN
Photos Frasnay and E. B. Weil.


 from the French science magazine ATOMES, October 1957

LA CYBERNETIQUE ET L'ART
Le Robot Danseur
Le sculpteur Nicolas Schöffer a réalisé cette composition spatiale en acier et duraluminium que l'on voit ci-contre et sur la couverture de ce numéro, à laquelle a été adjoint un cerveau électronique mis au point par la S. A. PHILIPS.
L'ensemble est fixé sur un socle monté sur quatre roulettes. Dans ce socle se trouvent le mécanisme et le cerveau électronique (photo ci-dessus).
CYSP-I (abréviation de CYbernétique, SPatiodynamique) est la première « sculpture spatiodynamique » dotée d'une autonomie totale de mouvement : déplacement dans tous les sens à deux vitesses, ainsi que rotation axiale et excentrique et animation de ses seize plaques polychromes pivotantes.
Chacune des plaques ou des ailettes montées sur la charpente est actionnée par un petit moteur placé sous son axe.
Des cellules photoélectriques et un microphone intégrés dans l'ensemble, captent toutes les variations intervenant sur le plan de la couleur, de l'intensité lumineuse et de l'intensité sonore.
L'ensemble de ces changements provoque des réactions de la sculpture consistant en des mouvements de déplacement et d'animation combinés. Par exemple, elle s'excite à la couleur bleue, c'est-à-dire qu'elle fait tourner rapidement ses plaques;  elle se calme au rouge, mais en même temps elle s'exalte au silence et se calme au bruit. Elle s'excite aussi dans l'obscurité et s'apaise à la lumière intense.
Etant donné que ces phénomènes sont constamment variables, les réactions sont également toujours changeantes et imprévues, ce qui donne à l'ensemble une vie et une sensibilité quasi-organiques. Cependant, pour des raisons de sécurité, les déplacements de la sculpture sont téléguidés.
Le danseur-robot CYSP I a participé à différentes manifestations comme la « Nuit de la Poésie », au théâtre Sarah Bernhardt, le Festival de l'Art d'avant- garde sur la terrasse de la « Cité Radieuse » de Le Corbusier à Marseille.
Il pourra prendre place dans des spectacles cinématographiques. C'est ainsi qu'est prévue la réalisation d'un film abstrait utilisant tous les effets visuels qu'on peut obtenir, comme par exemple l'effet stroboscopique qui se produit quand ses plaques polychromes tournent à la vitesse des vibrations lumineuses, donnant ainsi un effet de mélanges colorés immatériels. Son ombre, projetée en mouvements, dédouble le spectacle.
Cet être artificiel est le prototype de toute une série d'autres sculptures spatiodynamiques qui, en groupe, pourront réaliser un grand spectacle cybernétique au sol et même dans les airs, créant ainsi une véritable synthèse entre les conceptions esthétiques les plus avancées et les moyens scientifiques les plus actuels, susceptibles de multiplier à l'infini leurs possibilités attractives.

Translation:

CYBERNETICS AND THE ART
The Robot Dancer
The sculptor Nicolas Schöffer created this spatial composition of steel and duraluminium shown opposite and on the cover of this issue, to which was added a electronic brain developed by S. A. PHILIPS.
The assembly is mounted on a platform mounted on four wheels. In this base are the mechanism and the electronic brain (pictured above).
CYSP-I (abbreviation of Cybernetics, SPatiodynamique) is the first "sculpture spatiodynamique" with an autonomy of movement: Movement in all directions at two speeds, as well as axial and eccentric rotation and animation of its sixteen plates pivoting polychrome.
Each of the plates or fins mounted on the frame is actuated by a small motor under its axis.
Photoelectric cells and a microphone integrated into the whole, capture all the variations in terms of color, light intensity and the intensity of sound.
All these changes cause reactions sculpture consisting of travel movements and animation combined. For example, they get to the blue, ie it rotates rapidly on its plate, it calms down to red, but at the same time excited by silence and quiet noise. As they get in the dark and subsides to the light.
Since these phenomena are constant variables, the reactions are always changing and unforeseen, which gives a life and an almost organic sensibility. However, for security reasons, the movement of the sculpture are remote-controlled.
The dancer-robot CYSP I participated in various events like "Night of Poetry," Sarah Bernhardt at the theater, the Festival of avant-garde art on the terrace of the "City Radieuse" of Le Corbusier in Marseille .
It may take place in cinematic entertainment. Thus was laid the execution of an abstract film using all the visual effects that can be obtained, such as the stroboscopic effect that occurs when its polychrome plates rotate at the speed of light vibrations, thus a colorful mix of intangibles. His shadow, projected movement, doubling the performance.
This being artificial is the prototype of a whole series of other sculptures spatiodynamiques which group can make a big show cyber ground and even in the air, creating a true synthesis between aesthetic designs the most advanced and scientific the most current, likely to multiply in their infinite possibilities attractive.



 Valse à 120 volts (Article paru dans le magazine mensuel TOUT SAVOIR, septembre 1956)

VALSE A 120 VOLTS
Article paru dans le magazine mensuel TOUT SAVOIR de septembre 1956 (pages 37 à 39, 5 photos et 1 portrait)
suivi d'un commentaire d'Eléonore Schöffer.
 
L'ELECTRONIQUE, on le sait, envahit chaque jour des domaines où il eût paru invraisemblable qu'elle s'aventurât. Ainsi, le 12 juillet dernier, nous annonçait-on que l'automation avait, si l'on peut dire, mis la main sur la musique.
Mais oui : la Burroughs Corporation de Pasadena (Californie) a mis au point une machine qui, toute seule, compose des chansons ! Ainsi le "génie" contemporain a fignolé un cerveau électronique qui est capable de produire (sans essoufflement) mille mélodies populaires à l'heure, en recueillant des messages chiffrés et en les assemblant selon quelque schéma mélodique.
Vous vous dites sans doute qu'il s'agit là d'une sorte de record du monde dans le domaine, si fréquenté, de l'audace électronique.
Erreur. C'est nous, Français, qui possédons ce record du monde. Lisez bien…
Un socle cylindrique d'une quarantaine de centimètres de haut. Au-dessus, des barres métalliques plantées à la verticale. Et, s'échappant de ces barres, à hauteur d'homme, d'autres tiges, et des plaques de métal. De toutes formes, de toutes couleurs.
C'est un objet volumineux, une "chose" rigoureusement indéfinissable, sous quelque angle qu'on regarde. Cela ne ressemble à rien. Tout au plus peut-on songer à quelque combinaison de sémaphore, ou à un de ces objets insolites que les enfants construisent parfois avec les pièces de leur Meccano.
La bizarre construction s'appelle "Cysp1" . C'est une oeuvre d'art. Et aussi une machine. Une machine considérée comme une oeuvre d'art. En réalité, nous tenons là une sculpture cybernétique (la première qui existe au monde), que l'on dénomme également composition spatiale, en acier et duraluminium.
Il y a mieux. Cette sculpture, en effet, n'est pas immobile. Elle tourne, elle DANSE… Nous y voilà : Cysp1 est une danseuse. Une danseuse électronique.
Si, au lieu de rire, vous voulez bien réfléchir un instant, vous serez tenaillé par cette alternative : ou c'est prodigieux ou c'est l'oeuvre d'un fou singulièrement tourmenté par l'électronique…
Décrivons plus précisément l'engin. Sous le socle cylindrique, monté sur roulettes, se cache un mécanisme complexe et un cerveau électronique. Ceux-ci, par un assemblage d'axes, sont liés aux plaques de métal qui surmontent l'appareil. Disposées en un désordre apparemment total, on dénombre onze plaques rectangulaires et cinq en forme de disque. De dimensions diverses, elles sont toutes pivotantes et polychromes : rayures bleues et jaunes, bandes rouges, blanches et jaunes, etc… Chacune de ces plaques, est actionnée par un petit moteur, relié au cerveau caché dans le socle. Dans les recoins de l'infrastructure, sont logés des microphones et des cellules photo électriques, qui captent toutes les variations de couleur, d'intensité lumineuse et d'intensité sonore.
Là, nous touchons à l'essentiel. En effet, toutes les modifications de couleur et d'intensité affectent immédiatement l'étrange robot qui, aussitôt, entame quelque mouvement. La couleur bleue, par exemple, ou un son aigu, excitent Cysp1. Alors, la machine tourne de gauche à droite, agite ses plaques dans un sens donné, à une vitesse quelconque. Si, au contraire, vous proposez à Cysp1 une couleur rouge, une sonorité plus grave, une lumière vive, alors elle s'effraie, recule, tourbillonne sur elle-même, agite ses plaques dans un autre sens, à une autre vitesse… On devine le résultat : lorsque l'expérience se passe nuitamment, les plaques jettent frénétiquement des gifles multicolores sur les murs, comme un Kaléidoscope en folie, et l'échafaudage de tubes s'agite furieusement sur ses roues caoutchoutées.
Ces jeux apparemment incohérents de lumières et de mouvements sont réellement impressionnants d'étrangeté. Je n'y ai décelé, pour ma part, aucune beauté : Cysp1 ne m'a paru qu'un énorme jouet qui ne représente rien, et fait songer à cette fabuleuse machine si compliquée qu'un Américain fabriqua un jour… et qui ne servait strictement à rien ! …
Sculpture, électronique, ou l'une et l'autre?
A quoi répond donc cette création, géniale ou burlesque, selon les goûts ?
N. Schöffer, l'inventeur, le dit lui-même :
- Le spectacle figuratif a vécu. Et même l'art abstrait conventionnel.
Nous sommes dans une époque de rupture. Il faut suivre les précurseurs et je veux, moi, rompre avec la conception traditionnelle de la sculpture…
Nicolas Schöffer, précisons-le, est un artiste d'origine hongroise. Il a suivi les cours des Ecoles des Beaux-Arts de Budapest, puis de Paris.
- Quoi qu'on en dise, j'estime avoir subi une évolution très normale, un monde qui est de plus en plus accéléré.
N. Schöffer parle avec fougue et conviction. Front dégarni, yeux clairs, on pourrait le traiter de "prophète". Il se place, en tout cas, à l'extrême avant-garde.
C'est sans doute un visionnaire, jailli tout droit, peut-être, d'une tranche de science-fiction, d'art-fiction.
Cysp1, a-t-il dit, est une sculpture spatiodynamique. Qu'est-ce que…
- C'est en 1948 que j'ai découvert, créé le spatiodynamisme ; son but est l'intégration constructive et dynamique de l'espace dans l'oeuvre plastique. La sculpture spatiodynamique est créée d'abord par une ossature dont le rôle est de circonscrire et capter une fraction de l'espace en déterminant le rythme de l'oeuvre.
- Et alors ?…
- … Le spatiodynamisme doit bouleverser les concepts actuels de l'urbanisme. Il est logique que le dispositif d'ensemble soit conçu par le sculpteur, et non par l'architecte. Le "plastique" doit avoir le pas sur le "fonctionnel"…
- Mais votre robot-danseur ?…
- Le mouvement, la couleur et le son font partie de l'oeuvre et ils interviennent avec de constantes variantes grâce à l'électronique. La sculpture spatiodynamique est une sculpture-spectacle. Sa sonorisation est même possible en extrayant et utilisant des sons des différents éléments qui composent la sculpture…
Personnage hors série, Schöffer croit sincèrement, lui, à l'immense avenir de son insolite conception de la sculpture. Le 9 août dernier, en soirée, les Marseillais purent assister à cet évènement : Cysp1 dansa, dans la nuit trouée d'étoiles, en compagnie d'un couple de danseurs réputés, Michèle Seigneuret et Maurice Béjart, que ne rebute aucune audace. Pourtant accoutumés à la plaisanterie, les Marseillais furent médusés. Et hilares.
D'autant plus que ce gala ébouriffant se déroula sur la terrasse de la Cité Radieuse, que l'on sait être la "maison du fada" … Coïncidence fâcheuse, on en conviendra !
- Celui-là, peuchère, disait un spectateur en parlant de N. Schöffer, il a pris le soleil en plein sur la tête !…
Qu'on se moque de lui, le père du spatiodynamisme n'en a cure.
- Van Gogh était bizarre, lui aussi, à son époque…", me disait-il, l'autre jour.
J.-L. V.
N.B. On doit à la vérité de dire que sur le strict plan de la mécanique et de l'électronique, Cysp1 constitue une trouvaille assez extraordinaire.
Commentaire d'Eléonore Schöffer : Toute nouveauté scientifique ou technique est reçue avec crainte : la vitesse de 35 Km/h des premiers trains terrifiait, le coeur ne résisterait pas… Mais certains "osent" ! Quant à l'art, toute nouveauté fait rire : l'artiste est un "piqué".
Les "nouveautés" techniques et scientifiques se démodent et passent, remplacées par d'autres, plus performantes… Les nouveautés artistiques s'apprécient autrement avec le temps… L'impressionnisme… Van Gogh pour lequel se dépensent des sommes fabuleuses! L'art gagne en valeur avec le temps mais c'est aussi avec le temps que la société évolue suffisamment pour devenir capable de comprendre et d'aimer. L'artiste paraît "en avance" lorsqu'il est simplement en prise directe sur son temps, alors que c'est la plus grande partie de la société qui est en retard, agrippée qu'elle est à des habitudes et des valeurs dépassées, méfiante pour toute nouveauté, et paresseuse à s'adapter mentalement à des processus plus complexes.
Il faut pour tout chercheur de grandes qualités de force, de courage, de fidélité à soi-même pour résister aux sarcasmes, obtenir des décideurs leur confiance, et la possibilité de réaliser ce qui était "impensable"…
Ce fut le cas pour CYSP 1. Marcel JOLLY, alors directeur de Philips-France, raconte son hésitation devant la proposition ahurissante de ce jeune artiste :" et ce fut, dit-il, comme miser sur un cheval…!" Que ce décideur intrépide soit ici remercié de son pari courageux.

 
VALSE A 120 VOLTS
 Article published in the monthly magazine ALL KNOW  September 1956  (pages 37 to 39, 5 photos and 1 portrait)
 followed by a comment from Eléonore Schöffer.
 
 ELECTRONICS, as we know, every day invades areas where it had seemed unlikely that she s'aventurât.  Thus, on 12 July, we announced that we had automation, so to speak, put his hand on the music.
 But yes, the Burroughs Corporation in Pasadena (California) has developed a machine which, itself, consists of songs!  Thus the "genius" refined contemporary electronic brain that is capable of producing (without breath) one thousand melodies popular at the time, by collecting encrypted messages and assembling them according to some melodic pattern.
 You say without doubt that this is a sort of world record in the field, if used, boldness mail.
 Mistake.  It is we, the French, who have the world record.  Read …
 A cylindrical base of about forty centimeters high.  On top of metal bars planted vertically.  And escaping from these bars, up to man, other rods, and metal plates.  Of all shapes, all colors.
 This is a large, a "thing" strictly indefinable in any angle you look.  This is like nothing.  At most, we can consider some combination of the semaphore, or one of those unusual objects that children sometimes build with the parts of Meccano.
 The strange building called "Cysp1.  It is a work of art.  And also a machine.  Machine considered a work of art.  In fact, we would like is a cybernetic sculpture (the first that exists in the world), which is also called spatial composition, steel and duraluminium.
 There are better.  This sculpture, in fact, is not stationary.  She turns, she danced …  Here we go: Cysp1 is a dancer.  A dancer electronics.
 If, instead of laughing, you want to reflect for a moment, you will be plagued by this alternative: either it is or it is the prodigious work of a madman particularly troubled by the electronic …
 Specifically describe the equipment.  Under the cylindrical base, mounted on casters, lies a complex mechanism and an electronic brain.  The latter, by an assembly of axes are related to metal plates that overcome the device.  Arranged in a disorder apparently total, there are eleven and five rectangular plate-shaped disc.  Different sizes, they are pivoting and polychrome: blue and yellow stripes, red stripes, white and yellow, etc …  Each of these plaques is operated by a small motor connected to the brain hidden in the base. In the recesses of the infrastructure are housed microphone and photo electric cells, which capture all the variations of color, light intensity and loudness.
 Here we touch on the essentials.  Indeed, any changes in color and intensity affect immediately the strange robot, which immediately began some movement.  The color blue, for example, or a sharp, excited Cysp1.  So the computer is running from left to right, shakes his plates in a given direction at any speed.  If, however, you propose to Cysp1 red, a more serious tone, a bright light, then it frightened, falling, swirling in on itself, shake his plate in another direction at another speed .. .  One can guess the result: when the experiment is going on night, the cast plates multicolores frantically slaps on the walls, like a kaleidoscope in madness, and the scaffolding tubes agitated furiously on rubber wheels.
 These apparently inconsistent play of light and movement is really impressive strangeness.  I did detect, for my part, no beauty Cysp1 did published a huge toy that does nothing, and think about this fabulous machine so complicated that an American manufactured one day …  and is used strictly for nothing …
 Sculpture, electronic, or both?
 What therefore this work, or brilliant burlesque to taste?
 N.  Schöffer, the inventor, himself says:
 - The show has lived figurative.  And even abstract art conventional.
 We are in a time of rupture.  We must follow the precursors and want me to break with the traditional concept of sculpture …
 Nicolas Schöffer, get it, is an artist of Hungarian origin.  He followed the course of the Ecoles des Beaux-Arts in Budapest, then Paris.
 - Whatever you say, I have been a very normal, a world that is increasingly accelerated.
 N.  Schöffer speaks with enthusiasm and conviction.  Front empty, clear eyes, you might deal with "prophet".  It takes place in any case, in the extreme avant-garde.
 It is without doubt a visionary, sprang straight, perhaps a slice of science fiction, art, fiction.
 Cysp1, he said, is a sculpture spatiodynamique. What …
 - In 1948 I discovered,  spatiodynamisme created, its aim is the integration of dynamic and constructive space work in the plastic.  Spatiodynamique sculpture was created by a first frame whose function is to contain and capture a fraction of space in determining the pace of the work.
 - And then …
 - …  The spatiodynamisme must change existing concepts of town planning.  It makes sense that the whole device is designed by the sculptor, not the architect.  The "plastic" must take precedence over the "functional" …
 - But your robot-dancer …
 - The movement, color and sound are part of the work and they work with constant variations through the mail.  Spatiodynamique sculpture is a sculpture show.  His sound is possible by extracting and using sounds of different elements of the sculpture …
 Occasional character, Schöffer believes him, the future of his immense unusual design of the sculpture.  On 9 August last evening, the Marseillais able to attend this event: Cysp1 danced on the night of Star break, with a couple of famous dancers, Michèle Seigneuret and Maurice Béjart, that does not discourage boldness.  Yet accustomed to the joke, the Marseillais were dumbfounded.  And hilarious.
 Especially since this ébouriffantes gala was held on the terrace of the Radieuse City, known to be the "house of the fada" …  Unfortunate coincidence, you will agree!
 - That man, peuchère, a spectator said in speaking of N.  Schöffer he took the sun right on the head …
 We make fun of him, the father of spatiodynamisme not a cure.
 - Van Gogh was weird, too, in his time … "He said the other day.
 J.-LV
 NB It is the truth to say that the strict terms of mechanics and electronics, Cysp1 is a quite extraordinary find.
 Commentary Eléonore Schöffer: Any scientific or technical novelty is received with fear: the speed of 35 km / h trains first terrified, the heart would not …  But some "dare"!  As for art, any novelty laugh: the artist is a "dive".
 The "new" technical and scientific become outdated and are replaced by more efficient …  The latest artistic appreciate over time otherwise …  Impressionism …  Van Gogh to spend which are fabulous!  The art is gaining in value over time but also over time as society changes enough to become capable of understanding and love.  The artist seems "ahead" when it is simply in direct its time, whereas most of the company that is late, it agrippée is in habits and values exceeded suspicious for novelty, and lazy to mentally adapt to more complex processes.
 It is necessary for any researcher of great qualities of strength, courage, loyalty to oneself to resist sarcasm, makers get their confidence, and the feasibility of which was "unthinkable" …
 This was the case for CYSP 1. Marcel JOLLY, then head of Philips France, says his reluctance to the proposal of this amazing young artist "and it was, he said, as betting on a horse …!"  That this decision is fearless here thanked for his courageous gamble.


 CYSP 1. Le danseur cybernétique (PHIL A PHIL, juin 1956)

CYSP 1 – Le danseur cybernétique
Extrait de la revue PHIL A PHIL de juin 1956
 Au cours de la "Nuit de la Poésie", organisée le 28 mai au Théâtre Sarah-Bernhardt, un robot danseur électronique extraordinaire a été présenté par son créateur, le sculpteur Nicolas Schöffer. L'animation de cette composition abstraite avait été confiée à Philips. Cette réalisation d'un danseur animé marque le premier effort tendant à allier la sculpture abstraite et la chorégraphie. Nicolas Schöffer, qui, on s'en souvient, avait déjà conçu avec le concours de Philips un robot compositeur unique au monde avec la Tour Spatiodynamique Cybernétique et Sonore l'année dernière dans le parc de Saint-Cloud, lors de la première Exposition Internationale du Bâtiment et des Travaux Publics, a ainsi réalisé une composition métallique polychrome douée d'une totale autonomie de mouvements. Un cerveau électronique, étudié et mis au point par nos ingénieurs, lui donne la posibilité de se déplacer, de tourner sur elle-même et d'animer les seize éléments mobiles qu'elle porte, à diverses vitesses. Chacun des mouvements est déclenché par des signaux lumineux ou sonores, captés par des cellules photoélectriques et des microphones intégrés dans l'ensemble, ce qui donne à l'appareil une sensibilité quasi oganique. Le danseur cybernetique "CYSP I" se déplacera et s'animera suivant le déroulement du scénario lumineux et sonore conçu par le chorégraphe. C'est sur un accompagnement de musique concrète de Pierre Henry, que "CYSP I" a fait ses "premiers pas" dans le monde. Ultérieurement, il "dansera" dans la troupe de Maurice Béjart.

English translation (using Google translator)
CYSP 1 – The dancer cybernetics
 Extract from the journal PHIL PHIL A June 1956
   During the "Night of Poetry", held May 28 at the Théâtre Sarah Bernhardt, an electronic robot dancer extraordinaire, was introduced by its creator, the sculptor Nicolas Schöffer.  The animation of abstract composition that had been given to Philips.  This realization of a dancer animated marks the first effort to combine the abstract sculpture and choreography.  Nicolas Schöffer, which we remember, had already developed with the assistance of a robot Philips composer in the world with Tower Spatiodynamique Cybernetics and Sound last year in the Parc de Saint-Cloud, at the first International Exhibition Building and Public Works, has achieved a good polychrome metal composition of full autonomy movements.  An electronic brain, studied and developed by our engineers, gives the possibility to move, to turn on itself and lead the sixteen moving it relates to various speeds.  Each movement is triggered by light or sound signals, captured by photocells and microphone integrated into the whole, giving the device a sensitivity almost organism.  The dancer cybernetics "CYSP I" will move and will liven the course of the following scenario sound and lighting designed by the choreographer.  On accompanying music concrete of Pierre Henry, that "I CYSP" was his "first steps" in the world.  Subsequently, it "dances" in the troupe of Maurice Béjart.
 


CYSP-1 at the ICA (above and below). Note the Antenna on CYSP-1 and the separate radio-control unit.   See video clip here of Swedish exhibition showing the radio-control unit. (You will have to register and login to MovieTone before you can view this).

Cysp-1 on the right, with Gordon Pask's Colloquy at ICA's Cybernetic Serendipity, 1968.


Electronic Design, Vol. 14, No. 1 -    January 4, 1966 

NEWS : Electronic pop-art art pops on the scene – p42

Roger Kenneth Field, News Editor

   During the past month, exhibits of electronic art have blossomed in New York with a frequency that suggests an aesthetic explosion in electronics or, at the very least, an electronic explosion in aesthetics.

   The word art is used advisedly. The creators of the works shown here do not represent these to be art in the classic sense. Not a single piece is fashioned of traditional material, nor with ordinary tools. In this new art, wire and junk iron replace marble and canvas; the welding torch and the screwdriver eliminate the -chisel and the paintbrush.

   All of the works move and most of them make funny noises. In theory, there is no reason why art objects shouldn't make noise, yet when the clatter of the other art completely drowns out the one you're trying to listen to, you quickly develop a respect for quiet museums. The creators of these contraptions may or may not be competent artists, (history must decide that), but they certainly have senses of humor.
  Marshall McLuhan, Canadian philosopher, observes that modern art is always one technology behind life. This is amply illustrated by these electronic efforts in our nuclear age. But Oscar Wilde said, "Life imitates art" and, indeed, there are pop-art people who bend every effort to look like the chap in the bottom photo on this page [not shown here].
 ……………………..
  A more finished product was executed by Nicolas Schoffer, a Parisian visionary and city-planner, as well as artist. In his plan for a "cybernetic city," robots like his Cysp I (see photo  above) can be summoned by pocket transmitter to perform a little spectacle anywhere.

  Design shortcomings are common to the other artists as well. Schoffer's Cysp 1 has a rear swivel wheel which jams because it has no caster. ………………
  Admittedly, these efforts merely represent a start. Whether the path will really ever be run or whether electronics artists will fade, as did the fist and shoulder pianists, is hard to predict.
  Certainly these examples in no way approach the present "state-of-the art." Perhaps a flurry of artistic activity among electronics design engineers will contribute to the culture as well as the technology of future generations.


The author with Eléonore Schöffer de Lavandeya at the Schöffer Museum, Kalosca, Hungary, June 2009.

See the site dedicated  to Nicolas Schöffer here.

Plaque on wall of Schöffer's Atelier in Paris.


VIDEO CLIPS are found here  and here (see below). You will have to register and login to MovieTone before you can view the first video clip.

LUMINO-DYNAMICS


1956 – Mechanical Animal – William Robert “Bert” Sutherland / Ivan E. Sutherland – (American)

 This copy of a letter from 1957 describes the first "Mechanical Animal" built by the Sutherland brothers, Bert and Ivan.

 

 

Here’s a transcript of the letter send from Ivan E. Sutherland to Grey Walter in 1957:

Nov 10. [IES  to WGW]
“Dear Sir:
Early last month I had sent to you two copies of a paper entitled “An Electro-mechanical Model of Simple Animals” which was submitted by my brother, Bert (William R. Sutherland), and his close friend, Mac (Malcolm G. Mugglin), to their department of Electrical Engineering. Perhaps a little of the history of that paper would be of interest to you.
I am now a Junior (3rd year) at Carnegie Tech, also studying electrical engineering – in this and many other things I have followed the lead of my brother. Bert is two years older than I, recently became married and is now on active duty as an officer of the U.S. Navy. Our interest in mechanical and electrical things probably comes from our father, a Civil Engineer from New Zealand: Ph. D. from London, but our first good luck and stimulation came when we met Edmund C. Berkeley in 1952.
Mr. Berkeley took an interest in the work that we had already done, namely a simple adding machine, and encouraged us to continue, both by suggesting problems and by providing funds for their solution. During the period October, 1952 to June, 1955 we worked under the guidance of Mr. Berkeley. We did a major protion [sic] of the work on a mechanical maze solving mouse similar to one constructed by Claude Shannon of Bell Labs. During the latter part of this same period, Bert left home for college, and I continued our work alone.
During this contact with Berkeley’s organization we often saw “squee”, his mechanical squirrel; this was our first contact with the species of mechanical animals. Our next contact came when we read your The Living Brain. We were both interested in all the things you have done, but most familiar with the mechanical and electrical aspects, and most interested in your Machina speculatrix. Can you imagine the joy of two young people reading about important work accomplished far away in a field they were just becoming part of?
It was no surprise to me when Bert suggested, about Christmas of 1955, that we build a mechanical animal also. On page 45 of Bert’s thesis is a picture of the first crude result. When this first model was finished, about May, 1956, Bert for some reason lost interest in the project for a time. During this period, May to December, 1956, I continued work on the second model, the one which finally became the subject of the paper sent [to] you.
About Christmas 1956, Bert decided to write his thesis. By the end of January I had finished making the frames, motor mounts etc for the models shown in the various pictures; these Bert took over, assembled and used as a basis for his work. Mechanically these machines were good; electrically they were incomplete, as the thesis shows. They had two big drawbacks however: the wet battery needed constant care, and by the way cost us many pairs of pants through acid holes; the machines were cumbersome and heavy.
At the moment, Bert is busy with his new wife and the Navy, so I am in charge of our project. To get around the two drawbacks mentioned I have constructed a third type of beast. This new model, commonly called “beastie” because of its smaller size, uses dry cells for power, is entirely operated by transistors and proves to be the best we have yet accomplished. However, although I have the mere construction problems fairly well met, I have not yet obtained any results from this latest model The problems which were not yet solved in when Bert’s paper was written are still not solved.
Perhaps by now you are wondering just why I should write this letter. It is a sort of news report, an information carrier rather than a questionnaire. I examine what we have done: we have a rather nice looking machine which will respond to light and avoid obstacles in a rather crude sort of way. We have a great many possibilities for future work. I examine what I think we should do next: proceed with communication and learning as interesting behaviour. Perhaps making the machines (I’d like to build more of the “beastie” type) play tag might be a good start. We need a better obstacle strategy.
Building these machines has been, to say the least, an education in itself. I have found time and time again that to us the problems of actual design and construction were fairly straightforward; the decisions such as I face now of what to do next are more difficult. Perhaps you have some ideas. I am, of course, curious to know what you think.”

CHALLENGE

I've tried to track down Bert Sutherland's thesis to obtain a picture and further details of this "beast", but without success. Maybe an American out there could find this information and I would happily publish it here. From the above article, the thesis was completed early 1957.